Page 46 - Tallinna Ülikool
P. 46
46
Men
45 50 40 45
Women
35 30 25 20 15 10
40 35 30 25 20 15 10
35 30 25 20 15 10
55 00
AT DE SE ES IT FR DK GR CH BE CZ PL Lu PT SI EE HR 65-69 80-84
AT DE SE ES IT FR DK GR CH BE CZ PL Lu PT SI EE HR 65-69 80-84
Figure 5. Share of respondents aged 65+ severely limited by age-groups
Attention: e results for certain age groups 75+ for Poland, Luxembourg, Portugal and Croatia should be treated with caution due to small numbers of observations. Source: own elaboration based on the 6th wave of SHARE (weighted results).
Men
35 30 25 20 15 10
Women
AT DE SE ES IT FR DK GR CH BE CZ PL Lu PT SI EE HR 65-69 80-84
55 00
AT DE SE ES IT FR DK GR CH BE CZ PL Lu PT SI EE HR 65-69 80-84
Figure 6. Share of respondents with at least one limitation in ADL by age-groups
Attention: e results for certain age groups 75+ for Poland, Luxembourg, Portugal and Croatia should be treated with caution due to small numbers of observations. Source: own elaboration based on the 6th wave of SHARE (weighted results).
Men
40 35 30 25 20 15 10
5
0 AT DE SE ES IT FR DK
Women
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
CH BE CZ PL Lu PT SI EE HR 65-69 80-84
0 AT DE SE ES IT FR DK
CH BE CZ PL Lu PT SI EE HR 80-84
65-69
Figure 7. Share of respondents with at least one limitation in IADL by age-groups
Attention: e results for certain age groups 75+ for Poland, Luxembourg, Portugal and Croatia should be treated with caution due to small numbers of observations. Source: own elaboration based on the 6th wave of SHARE (weighted results).
