THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF GROUNDS OF TALLINN
SUMMARY
City flora, garden flora, native flora, immigrant plants, alien species.
In 1997–1999, the flora of 109 sites was studied in Tallinn (Table 1). The study area covered 21.5 hectares; it is 0,15% of territory of Tallinn. Investigated grounds are in different parts of Tallinn, in different ecological, historical and social conditions. There have found 1001 species of vascular plants, of them 399 natural species (incl. immigrant species) and 602 introduced species (Table 2). In list of vascular plants of Tallinn have registered 1283 taxa of natural and immigrant plants (Kukk, 1991). Without causal immigrants, microspecies and evidently erroneous finds are in flora of Tallinn 906 natural species. Could be concluding that most of native species of Tallinn can not grow on ground areas.
The most widespread species (table 7) in Tallinn are Poa pratensis and Plantago major (both on 95% of grounds), Poa annua and Trifolium repens. The most common trees and shrubs are Malus domestica (76%), Ribes uva-crispa, Syringa vulgaris and Acer platanoides. The most common decorative herbs are Paeonia lactiflora (65%), Bellis perennis and Calendula officinalis. The most common food herbs are Anethum graveolens (58%), Fragaria ×ananassa, Rheum rhaponticum and Allium sativum. By the estimated coverage the most common species in Tallinn are Poa pratensis (12% of herb layer), Stellaria media, Lolium perenne and Poa trivialis (Table 11).
Importance of foreign species is great in the list of flora. (Fig.1) By the evaluated coverage of species alien cultivated herbs have only 13% of total coverage of Tallinn grounds herb layer, most of it have naturalised Lolium perenne (8.5% of total coverage) (Fig.2). Also native herb species are more frequent than cultivated species in mean (Table 3). The same rate of distribution can be conclude about native and introduced trees (tab. 4). But among the shrubs only introduced species are common (Table 5). In evaluation of vegetation is important number of annuals. Most of natural urban annuals are apophytes; they are growing in not stabile communities. Cultivated annuals are also not ecologically good, because the existence of these species is very strongly disposed by mode of horticulture and alternate very rapidly.
The richest grounds of Tallinn (Table 6) situate in old park-town Nõmme (mean 139 sp.) and in new garden-suburb Muuga (mean 141 sp.); the poorest are grounds of various old suburbs (mean 60 sp.). The most unique and characteristic species of parts of Tallinn are in Table 8. Introduction age of Tallinn cultivated species also have analysed (Table 10).
The most widespread species in Tallinn
l – native perennials |
Tallinn, total |
Nõmme (old park-garden suburb) |
Muuga (new summer-garden-suburb |
typical garden-suburbs |
old suburbs |
||||||
Total number of investigated gardens: 109antr – antropophyteapo – apophyte |
number |
number |
% of local grounds |
number |
% of local grounds |
number |
% of local grounds |
number |
% of local grounds |
||
Plantago major L. |
l |
antr |
104 |
38 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
14 |
78 |
27 |
96 |
Poa pratensis L. |
l |
apo |
104 |
35 |
92 |
19 |
100 |
18 |
100 |
27 |
96 |
Poa annua L. |
la |
antr |
101 |
34 |
89 |
17 |
89 |
18 |
100 |
27 |
96 |
Trifolium repens L. |
l |
apo |
95 |
36 |
95 |
18 |
95 |
16 |
89 |
20 |
71 |
Poa trivialis L. |
l |
apo |
93 |
30 |
79 |
19 |
100 |
17 |
94 |
25 |
89 |
Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg. |
l |
apo |
92 |
31 |
82 |
18 |
95 |
13 |
72 |
24 |
86 |
Stellaria media (L.) Vill. |
la |
apo |
91 |
34 |
89 |
11 |
58 |
14 |
78 |
27 |
96 |
Aegopodium podagraria L. |
l |
apo |
91 |
32 |
84 |
16 |
84 |
12 |
67 |
25 |
89 |
Chenopodium album L. |
la |
apo |
90 |
36 |
95 |
17 |
89 |
15 |
83 |
16 |
57 |
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medil. |
la |
antr |
89 |
34 |
89 |
13 |
68 |
13 |
72 |
23 |
82 |
Ranunculus repens L. |
l |
apo |
89 |
31 |
82 |
18 |
95 |
16 |
89 |
20 |
71 |
Epilobium montanum L. |
l |
apo |
81 |
34 |
89 |
16 |
84 |
13 |
72 |
17 |
61 |
Dactylis glomerata L. |
l |
apo |
81 |
34 |
89 |
12 |
63 |
8 |
44 |
21 |
75 |
Elymus repens (L.) Gould |
l |
apo |
80 |
29 |
76 |
13 |
68 |
16 |
89 |
17 |
61 |
Impatiens parviflora DC. |
la |
antr |
77 |
35 |
92 |
9 |
47 |
13 |
72 |
18 |
64 |
Lamium album L. |
l |
antr |
76 |
28 |
74 |
7 |
37 |
12 |
67 |
24 |
86 |
Festuca rubra L. |
l |
apo |
76 |
33 |
87 |
16 |
84 |
9 |
50 |
13 |
46 |
Polygonum arenastrum Boreau |
la |
apo |
73 |
29 |
76 |
9 |
47 |
10 |
56 |
20 |
71 |
Epilobium adenocaulon Haussln. |
l |
apo |
71 |
20 |
53 |
18 |
95 |
15 |
83 |
16 |
57 |
Lamium purpureum L. |
la |
antr |
70 |
27 |
71 |
19 |
100 |
16 |
89 |
7 |
25 |
Potentilla anserina L. |
l |
apo |
69 |
19 |
50 |
15 |
79 |
11 |
61 |
18 |
64 |
Glechoma hederacea L. |
l |
apo |
67 |
29 |
76 |
14 |
74 |
15 |
83 |
7 |
25 |
Geum urbanum L. |
l |
apo |
66 |
30 |
79 |
5 |
26 |
5 |
28 |
23 |
82 |
Veronica serpyllifolia L. |
l |
antr |
62 |
28 |
74 |
18 |
95 |
12 |
67 |
3 |
11 |
Chelidonium majus L. |
l |
antr |
62 |
32 |
84 |
9 |
47 |
10 |
56 |
10 |
36 |
Veronica chamaedrys L. |
l |
apo |
57 |
33 |
87 |
14 |
74 |
7 |
39 |
2 |
7 |
Sisymbrium officinale (L.) Scop. |
la |
antr |
56 |
20 |
53 |
1 |
5 |
7 |
39 |
23 |
82 |
Malus domestica Borlh. |
b |
83 |
27 |
71 |
18 |
95 |
18 |
100 |
16 |
57 |
|
Ribes uva-crispa L. (s.str.) |
a |
79 |
30 |
79 |
18 |
95 |
17 |
94 |
13 |
46 |
|
Syringa vulgaris L. |
a |
73 |
28 |
74 |
11 |
58 |
8 |
44 |
23 |
82 |
|
Acer platanoides L. |
b |
70 |
27 |
71 |
5 |
26 |
7 |
39 |
26 |
93 |
|
Rubus idaeus L. |
b |
68 |
24 |
63 |
17 |
89 |
14 |
78 |
12 |
43 |
|
Ribes rubrum L. |
a |
66 |
26 |
68 |
18 |
95 |
16 |
89 |
6 |
21 |
|
Ribes nigrum L. |
b |
65 |
22 |
58 |
19 |
100 |
16 |
89 |
8 |
29 |
|
Prunus domestica L. |
a |
65 |
19 |
50 |
18 |
95 |
16 |
89 |
12 |
43 |
|
Rosa indica hybrida hort. |
a |
52 |
18 |
47 |
18 |
95 |
11 |
61 |
5 |
18 |
|
Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch. |
a |
52 |
22 |
58 |
14 |
74 |
4 |
22 |
9 |
32 |
|
Betula pubescens Ehrh. |
b |
51 |
22 |
58 |
10 |
53 |
6 |
33 |
9 |
32 |
|
Pinus sylvestris L. |
b |
40 |
36 |
95 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||
Convallaria majalis L. |
lv |
75 |
29 |
76 |
12 |
63 |
10 |
56 |
20 |
71 |
|
Paeonia lactiflora Pall. |
v |
71 |
28 |
74 |
17 |
89 |
16 |
89 |
9 |
32 |
|
Anethum graveolens L. |
va |
63 |
23 |
61 |
18 |
95 |
16 |
89 |
4 |
14 |
|
Bellis perennis L. |
vl |
63 |
23 |
61 |
16 |
84 |
16 |
89 |
6 |
21 |
|
Calendula officinalis L. |
va |
60 |
23 |
61 |
15 |
79 |
14 |
78 |
6 |
21 |
|
Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne |
v |
56 |
19 |
50 |
18 |
95 |
13 |
72 |
6 |
21 |
|
Lolium perenne L. |
vl |
56 |
22 |
58 |
11 |
58 |
6 |
33 |
13 |
46 |
|
Primula x pruchoniciana hort. |
v |
54 |
27 |
71 |
14 |
74 |
9 |
50 |
4 |
14 |
|
Rheum rhaponticum L. |
v |
53 |
20 |
53 |
17 |
89 |
12 |
67 |
4 |
14 |
|
Myosotis sylvatica Hoffm. |
vl |
53 |
24 |
63 |
5 |
26 |
7 |
39 |
17 |
61 |
|
Iris germanica L. |
v |
51 |
22 |
58 |
14 |
74 |
8 |
44 |
4 |
14 |
|
Allium schoenoprasum L. |
lv |
50 |
20 |
53 |
15 |
79 |
10 |
56 |
4 |
14 |
|
Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. |
lv |
50 |
22 |
58 |
12 |
63 |
8 |
44 |
6 |
21 |
|
Allium sativum L. |
v |
50 |
18 |
47 |
18 |
95 |
12 |
67 |
2 |
7 |
|
Phlox paniculata L. |
v |
50 |
20 |
53 |
11 |
58 |
10 |
56 |
7 |
25 |
|
Bergenia crassifolia (L.) Fritsch |
v |
43 |
22 |
58 |
8 |
42 |
7 |
39 |
4 |
14 |
|
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. |
va |
42 |
12 |
32 |
17 |
89 |
11 |
61 |
1 |
4 |
|
Armoracia rusticana P.Gaertn., B.Mey. & Scherb. |
v |
41 |
13 |
34 |
10 |
53 |
12 |
67 |
5 |
18 |
|
Allium cepa L. |
v |
40 |
7 |
18 |
17 |
89 |
12 |
67 |
3 |
11 |
|
Primula elatior (L.) Hill |
v |
38 |
18 |
47 |
5 |
26 |
13 |
72 |
2 |
7 |
|
Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) A.W.Hill |
va |
37 |
12 |
32 |
15 |
79 |
9 |
50 |
1 |
4 |
|
Cucumis sativus L. |
va |
36 |
9 |
24 |
16 |
84 |
10 |
56 |
1 |
4 |
|
Lilium bulbiferum L. |
v |
35 |
10 |
26 |
4 |
21 |
10 |
56 |
9 |
32 |
|
Hesperis matronalis L. |
vl |
35 |
16 |
42 |
5 |
26 |
6 |
33 |
8 |
29 |
|
Saponaria officinalis L. |
vl |
28 |
14 |
37 |
2 |
11 |
2 |
11 |
8 |
29 |
|
Primula vulgaris Huds. |
v |
22 |
6 |
16 |
4 |
21 |
2 |
11 |
8 |
29 |
Figure 1. Importance of species groups in grounds flora (by number of species)
Figure 2. Importance of species groups in evaluated coverage of herbal layer